From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16227 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2008 18:40:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 15691 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jan 2008 18:39:39 -0000 Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080127183939.15690.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/26099] support for type traits is not available In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg03353.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #15 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-27 18:39 ------- > All in all I'm now thinking that > it's good to have such tests, we should only conditionalize the result of the > tests on -fpic/PIC, I suppose we do have a macro for that?!? How about binding locally when pic? E.g.: #ifdef __PIC__ static #endif function_foo() -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26099