From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26947 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2008 23:21:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 26591 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2008 23:20:31 -0000 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080130232031.26590.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/34982] [4.3 regression] calling a function with undefined parameters causes segmentation fault at -O1 or higher In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg03719.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #23 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-01-30 23:20 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 regression] calling a function with undefined parameters causes segmentation fault at -O1 or higher > (In reply to comment #21) > > but why does this happen only with -O1? > > Random value in eax register so we could put 0 in some cases but not others. Oops, I am going to commit obvious fix for that. Looks like my tester got lucky. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34982