From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19202 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2008 10:39:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 18757 invoked by uid 48); 31 Jan 2008 10:38:43 -0000 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 10:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080131103843.18756.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/33781] [4.3 Regression] "Arg list too long" building libgcc.a In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg03757.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #14 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-31 10:38 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I'll respond to Jakub's latest comments before trying DJ's more recent patch. > Running "getconf ARG_MAX" on my IRIX box, returns 20480, which is 20K. > I believe this is the default, out of the box setting for my machine which > is running IRIX 6.5.19m. I've had the same problem, and it indeed goes away if you set your ARG_MAX to something higher (I have 262144, which is the maximum possible value). It is even mentioned in the target specific installation notes, though it says there it is only required for Java. Maybe the target notes should be updated? -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Keywords| |documentation http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33781