[Bug fortran/35040] usage of init expression in its own definition

["burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-01-31 22:25 -------
Answer (see link): All these are wrong per answer to an interpretation request:

6.  INTEGER :: B = BIT_SIZE(B)
7.  INTEGER :: B(BIT_SIZE(B))
8.  INTEGER :: D = DIGITS(D)
9.  INTEGER :: D(DIGITS(D))
10. REAL :: X = EPSILON(X)
2.  INTEGER(selected_int_kind(4)) :: A(KIND(A)) 3.  INTEGER ::
A(2,2*SIZE(A,1)+1) 4.  CHARACTER :: C(10)*(SIZE(C,1)) 5.  INTEGER ::
P(10) = LBOUND(P,1)
1.  INTEGER :: P(complicated_expression_for_lower_bound_1:   &
                & complicated_expression_for_upper_bound_1,   &
                & complicated_expression_for_lower_bound_2:   &
                & complicated_expression_for_upper_bound_2) = &
                & RESHAPE( (/ 11, 21, 12, 22 /), SHAPE(P) ) 

And I also believe all our examples in this PR are wrong. While we really have
to reject
  REAL(8), PARAMETER :: xyz(size(xyz))  = 1
we could allow the others as extension (i.e. only reject using -std=f*) - or we
reject them all.


-- 

burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2008-01-31 22:25:49
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35040