From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30001 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2008 06:01:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 29908 invoked by uid 48); 1 Feb 2008 06:00:59 -0000 Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 06:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080201060059.29907.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/32760] [4.3 Regression] Error defining subroutine named PRINT In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pault at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00023.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #27 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 06:00 ------- (In reply to comment #26) > Created an attachment (id=15071) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15071&action=view) [edit] > A fix for the PR > > This is regtesting as I write. It fixes the first three PRs but not that of > comment #25. I believe that this will turn out to be a problem in patching > allocate because The patch regtests OK. > > write (*, *, iostat = isat) "hello" > > is OK. I will investigate this before submitting. I feel rather sure that a comparison of write and allocate will quickly reveal the problem. Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32760