From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6602 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2008 14:14:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 6508 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2008 14:14:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080201141411.6507.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/35045] [4.3 Regression] gcc-4.3 generates wrong code on i386 with -O3 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #18 from stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-02-01 14:14 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] gcc-4.3 generates wrong code on i386 with -O3 Why would we be calling expand_null_return to begin with, if there is a proper return statement? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35045