* [Bug other/35068] From
2008-02-04 0:28 [Bug other/35068] New: From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-04 0:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-04 0:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-04 0:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-04 00:28 -------
From
Testing
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35068
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35068] From
2008-02-04 0:28 [Bug other/35068] New: From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-04 0:29 ` [Bug other/35068] From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-04 0:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-04 0:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-04 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-04 00:30 -------
From: a
TEsting.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35068
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35068] From
2008-02-04 0:28 [Bug other/35068] New: From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-04 0:29 ` [Bug other/35068] From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-04 0:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-04 0:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-04 0:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-04 0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-04 00:32 -------
>From http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg01522.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg01522.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35068
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35068] From
2008-02-04 0:28 [Bug other/35068] New: From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-04 0:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-04 0:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-04 1:28 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-04 0:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-04 00:31 -------
>From http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-01/msg01522.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35068
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35068] From
2008-02-04 0:28 [Bug other/35068] New: From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-04 0:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-04 1:28 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-04 9:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-04 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-04 01:28 -------
>From all of us to all of you...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35068
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35068] From
2008-02-04 0:28 [Bug other/35068] New: From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-04 1:28 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-04 9:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-04 11:09 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-04 11:27 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-04 9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-04 09:29 -------
I can't reproduce the problem that showed up with
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2008-02/msg00328.html so closing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35068
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35068] From
2008-02-04 0:28 [Bug other/35068] New: From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-04 9:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-04 11:09 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-04 11:27 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-04 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-04 11:08 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> I can't reproduce the problem that showed up with
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2008-02/msg00328.html so closing.
>
Wow, that was weird... Hardware glitch?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35068
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35068] From
2008-02-04 0:28 [Bug other/35068] New: From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-04 11:09 ` manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-04 11:27 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2008-02-04 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-02-04 11:26 -------
> Wow, that was weird...
Yes, it was!
> Hardware glitch?
May be, our DHCP server at home did "funny" things during the week-end
(apparently it did not cope well with a new machine(?)). Could also be my own
"hardware".
Thanks for having looked at the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35068
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread