From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5114 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2008 22:51:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 2775 invoked by uid 48); 5 Feb 2008 22:50:42 -0000 Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080205225042.2772.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/23322] [4.1/4.2/4.3 regression] performance regression In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00618.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #20 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 22:50 ------- Last rumors I heard about LR splitting was that it didn't really helped and worked and used LOOP notes, so it would need complete rewrite anyway. This problem wasn't really LR splitting issue, just wrong caller save decision heuristic. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23322