From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18485 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2008 13:07:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 16100 invoked by uid 48); 7 Feb 2008 13:07:15 -0000 Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 13:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080207130715.16099.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/35117] Vectorization on power PC In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "eyal at geomage dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00820.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #12 from eyal at geomage dot com 2008-02-07 13:07 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Is there some pragma or a coding convention I can use to make the compiler > > understant those pointers have nothing to do with each other? > There is __restrict__, but it is useful only for function arguments. Ira, any suggestions as to how to solve this issue? I'd realy appriciate any help here as Im lost and we're close to giving up on PPC and vectorization all together. thanks eyal -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35117