From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9076 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2008 06:47:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 8918 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2008 06:46:27 -0000 Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 06:47:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080209064627.8917.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/35063] [Regression wrt g77] I/O leaks handles/memory on Windows XP In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jpr at csc dot fi" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg01026.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #32 from jpr at csc dot fi 2008-02-09 06:46 ------- Subject: Re: [Regression wrt g77] I/O leaks handles/memory on Windows XP hi, the patch looks good to me, although from the clarity point of view and to avoid potential problem with other thread models, i'd go all the way and introduce the __gthread_mutex_destroy() function in the gcc/gthr*.h files. juha > > > ------- Comment #29 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-08 18:10 ------- > Created an attachment (id=15118) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15118&action=view) > --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15118&action=view) > Proposed patch, needs testing on mingw > > Here is the patch. I have tested this on Cygwin, but not mingw. It is > regression testing on x86-64. A previous version passed regression testing, > but I am retesting after clean-up. > > I would appreciate if others would review/test this patch. > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35063 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35063