public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "eyal at geomage dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/35117] Vectorization on power PC
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080210134824.24580.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-35117-15734@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #21 from eyal at geomage dot com  2008-02-10 13:48 -------
(In reply to comment #14)
> Giving it another thought, this is not necessary an alias analysis issue, even
> that it fails to tell that the pointers not alias. Since in this case the
> pointers do differ, the runtime test should take the flow to the vectorized
> loop. Maybe the test is too strict. I'll look into this on Sunday.

Hi,
 Any update on this matter?

thanks
eyal


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35117


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-10 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-07  8:17 [Bug c++/35117] New: " eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-07 10:30 ` [Bug c++/35117] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-07 10:37 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-07 10:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-07 10:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-07 10:44 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-07 10:54 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2008-02-07 11:06 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-07 12:17 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-07 12:55 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2008-02-07 12:58 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-07 13:05 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2008-02-07 13:07 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-07 13:23 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2008-02-07 20:45 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2008-02-08  8:50 ` zaks at il dot ibm dot com
2008-02-08  8:55 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-08  8:58 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-10  7:31 ` eres at il dot ibm dot com
2008-02-10  7:42 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-10  7:57 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-10 13:49 ` eyal at geomage dot com [this message]
2008-02-10 15:07 ` victork at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-10 15:48 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-11 12:24 ` victork at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-11 13:36 ` irar at il dot ibm dot com
2008-02-11 13:42 ` victork at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-11 14:01 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-11 14:22 ` victork at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-11 16:30 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-12  8:43 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-12 10:52 ` victork at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-12 11:29 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-13 16:07 ` eyal at geomage dot com
2008-02-14 13:42 ` victork at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080210134824.24580.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).