From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23246 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2008 23:12:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 23142 invoked by uid 48); 11 Feb 2008 23:11:22 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 23:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080211231122.23141.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/35138] [4.3 Regression] g++ rejects valid code In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg01212.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-11 23:11 ------- cp_parser_class_name since PR20293 errors unconditionally even during tentative parse. Mark, is there a way to get a silent tentative parse of the optional nested name specifier plus typename? Or is trying to parse it tentatively as pseudo-dtor followed by parsing it as id-expression/member access if the former just never going to work? -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mark at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35138