public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/35202] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] exp->expf transformation incorrect with -fmath-errno
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 23:02:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080214230136.20536.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-35202-230@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-14 23:01 -------
There are more problems with -ferrno-math, see also PR29887.  It is btw unclear
to me whether -ferrno-math is supposed to preserve errno handling of whatever
the underlying libm provides or if it should actively do errno handling for
errors required by the standard or also for those that are optional by
the standard.  That is specifically how this option relates to 7.12.1,
especially if -ferrno-math effectively constrains the value of math_errhandling
or makes GCC assume a certain value of it.

Also what the effects of -ferrno-math are on the subtle difference of
"a ... error occurs" and "a ... error may occur".

Clarification would be much appreciated here, and I would like to effectively
make our default (-ferrno-math -ftrapping-math) be changed to
-fno-errno-math -ftrapping-math and providing math_errhandling ==
MATH_ERREXCEPT
by GCC, overriding the library.

Actually 7.12.1 does not say that errno is untouched if math_errhandling ==
MATH_ERREXCEPT, or does it do so implicitly?

Yet another reason why separating the math runtime from GCC is bad :(


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35202


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-14 23:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-14 22:03 [Bug tree-optimization/35202] New: " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-14 22:10 ` [Bug tree-optimization/35202] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-14 23:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2008-02-14 23:10 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2008-02-15 15:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-15 15:54 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-15 21:51 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2008-07-04 22:34 ` [Bug tree-optimization/35202] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-25 18:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-09  9:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-09  9:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080214230136.20536.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).