From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16997 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2008 16:21:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 16791 invoked by uid 48); 15 Feb 2008 16:20:45 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080215162045.16790.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/35204] [4.3 Regression] crash by too deep recursion in DFS tree-ssa-sccvn.c:1898 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg01710.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #10 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-15 16:20 ------- Re. comment #7, sure this can be P1 and block the release. SCC-VN doesn't have to be fixed for the release. This bug can be worked around. Not making a bug P1 because you want a release out the door is not a good readon. And unless I'm mistaken, a ICE-on-valid-code bug in C or C++ is always release-blocking anyway. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35204