public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/35178] New: Misaligned Accesses on arrays of packed stucts
@ 2008-02-13 13:39 chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-13 13:43 ` [Bug c/35178] " chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-13 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
This bug was noticed on sh but potentially impacts other STRICT_ALIGNMENT
targets.
The attached test case reduces a misaligned field access from an array of
packed structs. In this example compiled with -O2 the field wMaxPacketSize is
accessed (on sh4) with a mov.w instruction although it is byte aligned.
It seems that the tree-ssa-loop ivopts did not check packed struct offsets
indexed by an induction variable. Thus if the struct size is not aligned, the
field becomes unaligned after the first iteration even if it was aligned from
the base of this structure.
The proposed patch solves this problem by expanding may_be_unaligned_p to check
that a loop carried offset is a multiple of the desired alignment.
--
Summary: Misaligned Accesses on arrays of packed stucts
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: sh4-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35178
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/35178] Misaligned Accesses on arrays of packed stucts
2008-02-13 13:39 [Bug c/35178] New: Misaligned Accesses on arrays of packed stucts chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-13 13:43 ` chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-13 13:46 ` chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-13 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 13:42 -------
Created an attachment (id=15138)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15138&action=view)
gcc testsuite case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35178
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/35178] Misaligned Accesses on arrays of packed stucts
2008-02-13 13:39 [Bug c/35178] New: Misaligned Accesses on arrays of packed stucts chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-13 13:43 ` [Bug c/35178] " chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-13 13:46 ` chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-13 14:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-19 7:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/35178] " chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-13 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 13:45 -------
Created an attachment (id=15139)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15139&action=view)
Proposed patch
regression tested on sh-superh-elf and sh4-linux-gnu.
and bootstraped for i686-pc-linux-gnu.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35178
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/35178] Misaligned Accesses on arrays of packed stucts
2008-02-13 13:39 [Bug c/35178] New: Misaligned Accesses on arrays of packed stucts chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-13 13:43 ` [Bug c/35178] " chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-13 13:46 ` chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-13 14:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-19 7:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/35178] " chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-13 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 14:27 -------
patches should be sent to the gcc-patches mailing list.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35178
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/35178] Misaligned Accesses on arrays of packed stucts
2008-02-13 13:39 [Bug c/35178] New: Misaligned Accesses on arrays of packed stucts chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-13 14:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-19 7:54 ` chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-19 7:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 07:53 -------
fixed in mainline
--
chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
| |patches/2008-
| |02/msg00690.html
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35178
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-19 7:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-13 13:39 [Bug c/35178] New: Misaligned Accesses on arrays of packed stucts chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-13 13:43 ` [Bug c/35178] " chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-13 13:46 ` chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-13 14:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-19 7:54 ` [Bug tree-optimization/35178] " chrbr at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).