From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21415 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2008 21:05:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 21261 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2008 21:05:08 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080220210508.21260.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/35262] [4.4 Regression]: FAIL: abi_check In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg02164.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-02-20 21:05 ------- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: FAIL: abi_check > (In reply to comment #1) > > Jan, is this related to your patch? > > And if it is, then there is another bug somewhere else anyways as it could only > change inlining decisions. It might be the negative inlining cost assert. I will look into that. Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35262