public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/35262] [4.4 Regression]: FAIL: abi_check Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:07:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20080221000711.31428.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-35262-682@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #6 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-02-21 00:07 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]: FAIL: abi_check > > OK, > if it really is just inlining decision difference then we are fine. > I guess we can either update symbol list or mark always_inline Yes, from a robustness of the set of exported symbols point of view eventually we should anyway specify in the linker script to hide such symbols. However... > I can look into the reason why it is not getting inlined. It would help > to have preprocessed testcase as I am travelling now :) ... many thanks! Because I think 4.3.0 is right here, I think that small function should be indeed inlined. I'm going to add a trivial preprocessed file, which just instantiates std::basic_filebuf<char>: at -O2 the object contains the __check_facet<codecvt> symbol, at variance with 4.3. Many thanks again for looking into this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35262
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-21 0:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2008-02-20 15:43 [Bug c++/35262] New: " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-02-20 15:51 ` [Bug c++/35262] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-02-20 17:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-20 21:05 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-02-20 21:13 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-02-20 23:40 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-02-21 0:07 ` pcarlini at suse dot de [this message] 2008-02-21 0:09 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-02-24 13:46 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-03-02 17:36 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-03-03 0:51 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-03-03 16:22 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-03 16:24 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-03 19:05 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-03-03 23:46 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-03-04 0:10 ` pcarlini at suse dot de 2008-03-04 7:04 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-03-04 11:05 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20080221000711.31428.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).