public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "zhouyi04 at ios dot cn" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/35452] erasing uncessary warning for basic block frequency computation Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:03:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20080305070313.30083.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-35452-14209@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #1 from zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2008-03-05 07:03 ------- (In reply to comment #0) Sorry there are some problem with 1st patch because the edge e maybe removed after redirection. 2 4 | \ / \ 5 \ | 6 In function redirect_edge_succ_nodup, the edge from 5 to 6 will be removed because there exists one from 2 to 6. following is correct patch: --- gcc/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c~ Wed Mar 5 14:13:00 2008 +++ gcc/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c Wed Mar 5 14:13:52 2008 @@ -418,6 +418,10 @@ { bitmap_set_bit (cfgcleanup_altered_bbs, e->src->index); + + bb->frequency -= EDGE_FREQUENCY(e); + bb->count -= e->count; + if (e->flags & EDGE_ABNORMAL) { /* If there is an abnormal edge, redirect it anyway, and ######################################################### By the way, the frequency and count of forwarder block's succor will not be affected because he is the only child of the forwarder block. Anyone help me regression test it please -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35452
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-05 7:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2008-03-04 3:34 [Bug tree-optimization/35452] New: " zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2008-03-05 7:03 ` zhouyi04 at ios dot cn [this message] 2009-04-18 20:01 ` [Bug tree-optimization/35452] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20080305070313.30083.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).