From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19512 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2008 07:48:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 19380 invoked by uid 48); 5 Mar 2008 07:48:02 -0000 Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 07:48:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080305074802.19379.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/35467] Missed optimization in dependency analysis for arrays allocated by new() In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00289.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-05 07:48 ------- I guess I have almost all the missed optimization bugs already filed or something. Anyways this is an exact duplicate of bug 23383 (which I filed :) ). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23383 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |DUPLICATE http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35467