public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/35281] [4.3/4.4 Regression] multiply with 0 generated for 64*32->64
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080305111031.2496.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-35281-10175@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #7 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2008-03-05 11:10 -------
It looks that:

2006-11-03  Paolo Bonzini  <bonzini@gnu.org>
            Steven Bosscher  <steven@gcc.gnu.org>

        * fwprop.c: New file.
        ...
        * cse.c (fold_rtx_subreg, fold_rtx_mem, fold_rtx_mem_1, find_best_addr,
        canon_for_address, table_size): Remove.
        (new_basic_block, insert, remove_from_table): Remove references to
        table_size.
        (fold_rtx): Process SUBREGs and MEMs with equiv_constant, make
        simplification loop more straightforward by not calling fold_rtx
        recursively.
        (equiv_constant): Move here a small part of fold_rtx_subreg,
        do not call fold_rtx.  Call avoid_constant_pool_reference
        to process MEMs.

removed this functionality. Specifically this part:

-    /* If this is a constant pool reference, we can fold it into its
-       constant to allow better value tracking.  */
-    if (base && GET_CODE (base) == SYMBOL_REF
-       && CONSTANT_POOL_ADDRESS_P (base))
-      {
-       rtx constant = get_pool_constant (base);
-       enum machine_mode const_mode = get_pool_mode (base);
-       rtx new;
-
-       if (CONSTANT_P (constant) && GET_CODE (constant) != CONST_INT)
-         {
-           constant_pool_entries_cost = COST (constant);
-           constant_pool_entries_regcost = approx_reg_cost (constant);
-         }
-
-       /* If we are loading the full constant, we have an
-          equivalence.  */
-       if (offset == 0 && mode == const_mode)
-         return constant;
-
-       /* If this actually isn't a constant (weird!), we can't do
-          anything.  Otherwise, handle the two most common cases:
-          extracting a word from a multi-word constant, and
-          extracting the low-order bits.  Other cases don't seem
-          common enough to worry about.  */
-       if (! CONSTANT_P (constant))
-         return x;
-
-       if (GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_INT
-           && GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) == UNITS_PER_WORD
-           && offset % UNITS_PER_WORD == 0
-           && (new = operand_subword (constant,
-                                      offset / UNITS_PER_WORD,
-                                      0, const_mode)) != 0)
-         return new;
-
-       if (((BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN
-             && offset == GET_MODE_SIZE (GET_MODE (constant)) - 1)
-            || (! BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN && offset == 0))
-           && (new = gen_lowpart (mode, constant)) != 0)
-         return new;
-      }

This also explains why 4.2 doesn't fold HImode references ("Other cases don't
seem common enough to worry about.").

Can we have this functionality back, perhaps also for "Other cases", since
there are people that worry about them?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35281


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-03-05 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-21 20:50 [Bug rtl-optimization/35281] New: [4.3 regression] " astrange at ithinksw dot com
2008-02-21 21:36 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/35281] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-02-21 21:59 ` astrange at ithinksw dot com
2008-03-05 10:15 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-03-05 10:17 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-03-05 10:28 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/35281] [4.3/4.4 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-05 10:33 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-03-05 11:11 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com [this message]
2008-03-05 13:22 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-03-05 13:22 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-03-10 14:15 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-03-10 15:19 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-03-11 16:49 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-03-11 16:49 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-02  9:58 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-04-02 11:25 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/35281] [4.3 " bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-04-03  5:38 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-06 15:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-14 16:08 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-07-18 11:46 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-18 11:46 ` bonzini at gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080305111031.2496.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).