From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17943 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2008 22:06:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 17733 invoked by uid 48); 5 Mar 2008 22:05:22 -0000 Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080305220522.17732.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/35476] Accepts invalid: USE/host association of generics with same specifics In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pault at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00352.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-05 22:05 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Found the following on the J3 Fortran list. I think the program below is > invalid for the reasons given by Bill Long, but it has not finally decided yet > (on J3). (The question/program comes from Sun) This worries me a lot. If you recall, I did a lot of work on this and you acted as reviewer/collaborator. We concluded that, in general, the precedence rules should be accomplished without warnings or errors. Several of the exmaples in the standard guided us in this. I'll go and look at the correspondence. Paul who is still struggling and losing the fight with memory leaks in allocatable components. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35476