From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23572 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2008 13:33:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 22288 invoked by uid 48); 6 Mar 2008 13:32:15 -0000 Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:33:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080306133215.22287.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/35466] Different assembly codes on 32bit and 64bit hosts In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00373.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-06 13:32 ------- Different code for the same target on different hosts is a valid bug, not INVALID. If a target works with more than one HOST_WIDE_INT setting, the choice should not affect the code generated; this is separate from the question of whether x86 targets should allow 32-bit HOST_WIDE_INT. -- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35466