public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/35059] New: Seg fault when max constructor limit reached
@ 2008-02-02 17:28 jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-02 17:37 ` [Bug fortran/35059] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-02 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The following gives a segmentation fault with N > 65535. This is taken from
PR19925 Comment #10. I have the fix for the segfault.
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: N=100000
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: I(N)=(/(MOD(K,2),K=1,N)/)
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: M(N)=I(N:1:-1)
END
--
Summary: Seg fault when max constructor limit reached
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35059
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/35059] Seg fault when max constructor limit reached 2008-02-02 17:28 [Bug fortran/35059] New: Seg fault when max constructor limit reached jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-02 17:37 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-03 16:33 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-02 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-02 17:36 ------- Created an attachment (id=15080) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15080&action=view) Proposed patch to fix some segfaults This patch avoids the seg fault for the test case in this PR as well as the invalid code given in PR34828 Comment #10. I will submit this when 4.4 opens. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35059 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/35059] Seg fault when max constructor limit reached 2008-02-02 17:28 [Bug fortran/35059] New: Seg fault when max constructor limit reached jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-02 17:37 ` [Bug fortran/35059] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-03 16:33 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-29 22:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-12 1:11 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-03 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-03 16:32 ------- Just confirming this. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-02-03 16:32:52 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35059 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/35059] Seg fault when max constructor limit reached 2008-02-02 17:28 [Bug fortran/35059] New: Seg fault when max constructor limit reached jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-02 17:37 ` [Bug fortran/35059] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-03 16:33 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-29 22:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-12 1:11 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-29 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-29 22:51 ------- Subject: Bug 35059 Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Feb 29 22:50:25 2008 New Revision: 132782 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132782 Log: 2008-02-29 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/35059 * expr.c (find_array_element): Modify traversing the constructor to avoid trying to access NULL memory pointed to by next for the last element. (find_array_section): Exit while loop if cons->next is NULL. * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_scalar_char_value): Initialize gfc_typespec. (gfc_conv_function_call): Same. * decl.c (gfc_match_implicit): Same. * trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_conv_intrinsic_sr_kind): Same. Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/decl.c trunk/gcc/fortran/expr.c trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35059 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/35059] Seg fault when max constructor limit reached 2008-02-02 17:28 [Bug fortran/35059] New: Seg fault when max constructor limit reached jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2008-02-29 22:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-12 1:11 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-12 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-12 01:11 ------- Fixed on 4.4 -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35059 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-12 1:11 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-02-02 17:28 [Bug fortran/35059] New: Seg fault when max constructor limit reached jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-02 17:37 ` [Bug fortran/35059] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-03 16:33 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-29 22:51 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-12 1:11 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).