From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31088 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2008 05:20:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 30914 invoked by uid 48); 13 Mar 2008 05:19:18 -0000 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:20:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080313051918.30913.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/35339] Improve translation of implied do loop in transfer In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg00944.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-13 05:19 ------- I have a method figured out for async I/O that will handle things as they are now, However, it would greatly improve the situation if we fix this implied do loop business. -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2008-03-02 07:59:59 |2008-03-13 05:19:18 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35339