From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32252 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2008 07:12:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 32100 invoked by uid 48); 1 Apr 2008 07:11:39 -0000 Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080401071139.32099.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug debug/27574] [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] MIssing debug info at -O0 for a local variable in a C++ constructor In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #20 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-01 07:11 ------- I am just going to test this patch and relook at it when the test is finished but I can see what the issue is. at -O0 we have unit-at-a-time on. Though there is still an issue if we don't have any clones, I think. I will relook more into it after the bootstrap/test finishes. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2006-07-22 17:45:51 |2008-04-01 07:11:38 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27574