public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hutchinsonandy at aim dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/35542] [4.3 Regression] fwprop only propagates one operand
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080402154425.2561.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-35542-7746@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #6 from hutchinsonandy at aim dot com  2008-04-02 15:44 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.3 Regression] fwprop only propagates
 one operand

Eric,

it's difficult to give you a specfic example as the propagation is very 
sensitive to generated code. I found this looking at other AVR bugs and 
discovered it was not working. (I'll  look up that example latter for 
you).

It not an obvious thing as other (good) changes due to DF merge, 
re-arrange code enough to obscure the omission. But the result is an 
extra move or redundant instruction here and there.

(its also not at all specfic to AVR)

Andy





-----Original Message-----
From: eric dot weddington at atmel dot com <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: hutchinsonandy@aim.com
Sent: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 10:21 am
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/35542] [4.3 Regression] fwprop only 
propagates one operand




------- Comment #4 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com  
2008-04-02 15:21
-------
(In reply to comment #3)
> committed to trunk, will backport to 4.3 in due time (causes 
regressions for
> AVR)
>

Could you list what fails?
Thanks!


--


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35542

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35542


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-02 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-11 20:32 [Bug rtl-optimization/35542] New: " hutchinsonandy at aim dot com
2008-03-11 20:35 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/35542] " hutchinsonandy at aim dot com
2008-04-02  9:57 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-02  9:57 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/35542] [4.3 Regression] " bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-04-02 15:22 ` eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
2008-04-02 15:26 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-04-02 15:45 ` hutchinsonandy at aim dot com [this message]
2008-04-29  8:20 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-11 11:10 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-12 10:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-01  9:55 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2008-08-01  9:56 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080402154425.2561.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).