From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26420 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2008 20:27:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 25367 invoked by uid 48); 4 Apr 2008 20:27:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:27:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080404202711.25366.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/27997] Fortran 2003: Support type-spec for array constructor In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "d at domob dot eu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00379.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #19 from d at domob dot eu 2008-04-04 20:27 ------- Created an attachment (id=15429) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15429&action=view) Implements dynamic string length Finally, I managed to get dynamic string length working; however, this was more an experimentation thing for some parts. For instance, the generation of the tree-expression in gfc_trans_array_constructor was pure guessing and getting lucky, so I fear it is not quite done the right way; however, so far it works and I hope it is nearly correct now. This patch makes all my tests for constructor with typespec work, but it introduces two regression failures I'll still have to look at. And finally, I fear the style is yet to become perfect ;) -- d at domob dot eu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #15374|0 |1 is obsolete| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27997