From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30826 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2008 15:26:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 29643 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2008 15:25:31 -0000 Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080409152531.29641.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug ada/35880] GNAT (GCC) Ada does not generate symbolic debug for shared memory In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "charlet at adacore dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00713.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from charlet at adacore dot com 2008-04-09 15:25 ------- Subject: Re: GNAT (GCC) Ada does not generate symbolic debug for shared memory > The application is an aircraft simulation by stimulating avionics black boxes. > We use a debugger to examine state information while the simulation is running > to try to determine problem causes. Note that the GCC project is based on volunteers, so your PR may never get the high priority attention that you apparently require. For such critical usage, you may consider getting support for your compiler (or get familiar with the compiler to investigate this issue yourself). > I thought I read in the submission guidelines that an attachment was > acceptable in a case like this. If I should submit the file contents as a > large file, please point me to a sample so I know how to format the various > individual file contents. Having a tar file for sources is certainly fine. Having all the instructions and explanation inside a README in a tarball is an unnecessary indirection which can only delay review of your PR. Arno -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35880