From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8979 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2008 17:21:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 8511 invoked by uid 48); 11 Apr 2008 17:20:43 -0000 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080411172043.8510.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/35907] [4.3/4.4 Regression] 64-bit power6 glibc miscompilation In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00836.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-11 17:20 ------- Created an attachment (id=15467) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15467&action=view) Restore altivec regs after frame pointer setup I agree with Andrew, it looks like Eric's patch moved the restoring of the altivec registers to before the frame pointer code. The attached (non bootstrapped or regtested) fixes the problem for me. Does this look ok to everyone? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35907