From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15087 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2008 07:12:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 14945 invoked by uid 48); 12 Apr 2008 07:11:40 -0000 Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 07:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080412071140.14943.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug ada/18302] ACATS test c953002 (and others) hangs In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00869.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #18 from aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2008-04-12 07:11 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > OK, but sweeping the problem under the rug is not the solution on mainline. I'm not advocating making these failures disappear; I'd just prefer they FAIL rather than hanging, which disinclines one from running Ada tests at all. > > Normal dejagnu tests have a time limit; why should the ACATS testsuite be > > different? > Probably no reason. If there's no reason, then perhaps we can commit James' patch? Allowing any random Ada bug, particularly these which are probably not likely to be fixed soon, to hang the testsuite on MinGW, doesn't seem sensible. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18302