public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/36058] Not allowing pointers to derived types in COMMON Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 08:01:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20080427080103.10479.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-36058-15045@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-27 08:01 ------- gfortran's rejection is in line with g95, NAG f95, ifort, openf95, sunf95 and ifort. I think gfortran is right and the sequence (or bind(C)) attribute is needed. The reason is the same as for the following program: type my_t integer :: x, y, z end type my_t type(my_t) :: tt call foo(tt) contains subroutine foo(t) type foo_t integer :: x, y, z end type foo_t type(foo_t) :: t end subroutine end foo_t and my_t are different, incompatible types without SEQUENCE. From that point of view, it makes sense to reject your example. Additionally, I think the following also applies to pointers. ("my_wwsptr" is of a derived type [albeit with pointer attribute].) "C589 (R558) If a common-block-object is of a derived type, it shall be a sequence type (4.5.1) or a type with the BIND attribute and it shall have no default initialization." * * * If one now adds "SEQUENCE", gfortran rejects it as there is a default initialization; in principle this it can be allowed as the default initialization does not happen for pointers to derived types (only for its targets). However, I believe that C589 also applies in this case. The such modified program is rejected by NAG f95, sunf95, openf95, g95 and gfortran, but ifort accepts the program. * * * In conclustion, I think both error messages of gfortran are correct. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36058
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-27 8:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2008-04-27 4:25 [Bug fortran/36058] New: " w6ws at earthlink dot net 2008-04-27 8:01 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2008-04-27 13:24 ` [Bug fortran/36058] " w6ws at earthlink dot net 2008-04-27 15:31 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-29 5:22 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20080427080103.10479.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).