* [Bug testsuite/36087] [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717
2008-04-30 13:58 [Bug testsuite/36087] New: [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2008-04-30 14:10 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2008-05-13 22:00 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2008-04-30 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-04-30 14:09 -------
After reading again my post, I realized that rev. 134697 deals with i386 only
and should not affect powerpc and I don't see how 134714 can be the cause. All
the other revisions deal with branches or gfortran.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/36087] [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717
2008-04-30 13:58 [Bug testsuite/36087] New: [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2008-04-30 14:10 ` [Bug testsuite/36087] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2008-05-13 22:00 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-13 22:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-13 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-13 22:00 -------
Those tests have been failing for quite awhile and are reported through
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-04/msg01958.html.
Starting in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-04/msg01978.html we see:
ERROR: tcl error sourcing
/Users/regress/tbox/svn-gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/dg.exp.
ERROR: unmatched open brace in list
When that tcl error was fixed, the tests apparently started running again and
the failures were reported again.
It's a problem that the tests fail, but we should close this entry because the
failures are unrelated. The gcc.dg/memcpy-1.c failure is reported in 31677.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/36087] [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717
2008-04-30 13:58 [Bug testsuite/36087] New: [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2008-04-30 14:10 ` [Bug testsuite/36087] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2008-05-13 22:00 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-05-13 22:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-13 22:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-13 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/36087] [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717
2008-04-30 13:58 [Bug testsuite/36087] New: [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-13 22:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-05-13 22:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-15 21:05 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-13 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-13 22:08 -------
>ERROR: gcc.dg/var-expand3.c: error executing dg-final: no files matched glob
I reported this to the developer before:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg01229.html
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/36087] [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717
2008-04-30 13:58 [Bug testsuite/36087] New: [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-13 22:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-05-15 21:05 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-15 19:37 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-15 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-15 21:04 -------
For gcc.dg/var-expand3.c I've got a patch to scandump.exp to get rid of the
ERROR and report FAIL if the requested dump file doesn't exist. The test still
fails because of the issue in comment #3, but more cleanly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/36087] [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717
2008-04-30 13:58 [Bug testsuite/36087] New: [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-15 21:05 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-06-15 19:37 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-08 22:48 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-06-15 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-15 19:36 -------
I also see the pr35729.c failure on hppa*-*-*.
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr35729.c scan-rtl-dump-times loop2_invariant "Decided to move
invariant" 0
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |danglin at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/36087] [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717
2008-04-30 13:58 [Bug testsuite/36087] New: [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-06-15 19:37 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-08-08 22:48 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-08 23:36 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-08-08 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-08 22:46 -------
Janis --
I don't understand this PR. It sounds like this should just be closed out,
since the failures reported are long-standing, and, if necessary, new PRs
opened for the other issues reported here. Is that correct?
Thanks,
-- Mark
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |janis at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org, mmitchel at gcc dot gnu
| |dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/36087] [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717
2008-04-30 13:58 [Bug testsuite/36087] New: [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-08 22:48 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-08-08 23:36 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-08 23:41 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-08-08 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-08 23:34 -------
Mark, the tests started failing because -fdump-rtl-loop2 used to produce dump
files for all loop2_* passes. The compiler could be fixed to do that again, or
the tests mentioned here could be changed to use -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll and
-fdump-rtl-loop2_invariant instead of -fdump-rtl-loop2. I was expecting
someone to fix the compiler after Andrew complained about the change, but I
wouldn't mind modifying the tests and closing this PR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/36087] [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717
2008-04-30 13:58 [Bug testsuite/36087] New: [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-08 23:36 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-08-08 23:41 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2008-08-12 21:21 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-22 14:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mark at codesourcery dot com @ 2008-08-08 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2008-08-08 23:40 -------
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] test failures between
revs. 134696 and 134717
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-08 23:34 -------
> Mark, the tests started failing because -fdump-rtl-loop2 used to produce dump
> files for all loop2_* passes. The compiler could be fixed to do that again, or
> the tests mentioned here could be changed to use -fdump-rtl-loop2_unroll and
> -fdump-rtl-loop2_invariant instead of -fdump-rtl-loop2. I was expecting
> someone to fix the compiler after Andrew complained about the change, but I
> wouldn't mind modifying the tests and closing this PR.
OK, I understand much better now, thanks! Do we have a separate PR open
for the problem as well, or shall I retitle this one to more accurately
reflect the problem?
Thanks,
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/36087] [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717
2008-04-30 13:58 [Bug testsuite/36087] New: [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-08 23:41 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
@ 2008-08-12 21:21 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-22 14:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-08-12 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-12 21:20 -------
Subject: Bug 36087
Author: janis
Date: Tue Aug 12 21:18:54 2008
New Revision: 139037
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=139037
Log:
PR testsuite/36087
* gcc.dg/var-expand3.c: Fix name of dump file.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/var-expand3.c
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/36087] [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717
2008-04-30 13:58 [Bug testsuite/36087] New: [4.4 Regression] test failures between revs. 134696 and 134717 dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-12 21:21 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-08-22 14:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-08-22 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-22 14:39 -------
Closing as fixed. The memcpy issue is tracked separately, the pr35729.c
failure
should be filed in a less confusing bugreport.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36087
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread