public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-2744@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-11-22 20:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-22 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-22 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-22 20:57 -------
f3 problem is PR 24989 which I have a fix for already, testing it right now.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-2744@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2005-11-22 20:57 ` [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-22 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-22 22:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-22 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-22 21:00 -------
The current issue with f4 is that (~((int)a)) != 0 is not converted to ((int)a
!= (~0)) which will then fold to 1, this issue with ~a != 0 not being convert
to a != ~0 is PR 24990 which I am working on a fix.


Then the only one left in this bug would be f1.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-2744@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2005-11-22 20:57 ` [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-22 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-22 22:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-11-25  5:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-22 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-22 22:24 -------
I think the first one is harder, I think part of this is already done for int
type but not boolean_type maybe that is a hint on how to fix it.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GCC target triplet|alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-2744@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-22 22:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-11-25  5:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-02-18 17:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-11-25  5:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-11-25 05:06 -------
So now truely only f1 is the only one to fix.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-2744@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-11-25  5:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-18 17:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-03-02 14:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-18 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-18 17:32 -------
Acutally f3 is not fixed but I don't understand how not.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-2744@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-18 17:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-02 14:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-04-30 19:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-04-30 20:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-02 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-03-02 14:21 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> Acutally f3 is not fixed but I don't understand how not.

No f3 is fine, f4 is broken still.
  *p = (int) *p != -1;


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-2744@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-03-02 14:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-04-30 19:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-04-30 20:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-04-30 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-30 19:26 -------
On the trunk we have:

f1 (const _Bool * p)
{
<bb 2>:
  return (_Bool) ((int) *p & 1);

f2 (const _Bool * p)
{
<bb 2>:
  return *p;

f3 (_Bool * p)
{
<bb 2>:
  *p = (_Bool) !*p;

f4 (_Bool * p)
{
<bb 2>:
  *p = 1;

where i686 assembly looks good for all cases.

Still f4 looks weird (wrong-code?!) as we fold *p = ~*p to *p = (int) *p != -1;
I'll open a PR for this.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-2744@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-04-30 19:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-04-30 20:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-04-30 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-04-30 20:00 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> Still f4 looks weird (wrong-code?!) as we fold *p = ~*p to *p = (int) *p != -1;
> I'll open a PR for this.

We decided this was the correct thing as we start out with ~((int)*p) != 0
which then gets folded into (int)*p != -1 and then VRP comes around and says
(int)*p can only be [0,1] so it gets folded into 1.

Chris said the same thing in comment #2.

So f4 is now fixed.

In summary, we still have some issues though:
f1: not fixed (at least on PPC):
        lbz 3,0(3)
        rlwinm 3,3,0,31,31
        blr
That mask should not be there.
f2: fixed:
f2:
        lbz 3,0(3)
        blr
f3: fixed
f3:
        lbz 0,0(3)
        xori 0,0,1
        stb 0,0(3)
        blr

f4: fixed, only a store of 1.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-07-20 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-20 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-20 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

--- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-20 13:36:33 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 20 13:36:30 2011
New Revision: 176510

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176510
Log:
2011-07-20  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

    PR middle-end/18908
    * tree.c (integer_all_onesp): Use TYPE_PRECISION, not mode precision.
    * tree-ssa-forwprop.c (simplify_bitwise_binary): Remove bogus
    ADDR_EXPR folding.  Canonicalize X ^ ~0 as ~X.

    * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr18908.c: New testcase.
    * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bitwise-sink.c: Adjust.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/tree.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-07-19 13:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-20 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-07-20 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-20 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

--- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-20 13:35:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jul 20 13:35:20 2011
New Revision: 176508

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176508
Log:
2011-07-20  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

    PR middle-end/18908
    * tree.c (integer_all_onesp): Use TYPE_PRECISION, not mode precision.
    * tree-ssa-forwprop.c (simplify_bitwise_binary): Remove bogus
    ADDR_EXPR folding.  Canonicalize X ^ ~0 as ~X.

    * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr18908.c: New testcase.
    * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bitwise-sink.c: Adjust.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr18908.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bitwise-sink.c
    trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-07-19 13:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-19 13:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-07-20 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-07-20 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-19 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.7.0

--- Comment #17 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-19 13:29:49 UTC ---
Now we get

f1:
.LFB0:
        .cfi_startproc
        movzbl  (%rdi), %eax
        ret
f2:
.LFB1:
        .cfi_startproc
        movzbl  (%rdi), %eax
        ret
f3:
.LFB2:
        .cfi_startproc
        xorb    $1, (%rdi)
        ret
f4:
.LFB3:
        .cfi_startproc
        movb    $1, (%rdi)
        ret


thus, fixed.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-07-19  8:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-19 13:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-07-19 13:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-19 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-19 13:28:19 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 19 13:28:15 2011
New Revision: 176460

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176460
Log:
2011-07-19  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

    * expr.c (expand_expr_real_2): Remove TRUTH_*_EXPR handling.
    (expand_expr_real_1): Remove TRUTH_*IF_EXPR and STATEMENT_LIST
    handling.

    PR middle-end/18908
    * expr.c (expand_expr_real_2): Do not unnecessarily truncate the
    result of BIT_*_EXPR to bitfield precision.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/expr.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-07-18 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-07-19  8:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-19  8:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-07-19 13:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-19  8:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-19 08:33:23 UTC ---
On x86_64 we have

f3:
.LFB2:
        .cfi_startproc
        xorb    $1, (%rdi)
        andb    $1, (%rdi)
        ret

already, thus only a truncation to bitfield precision is left.

As we expand ~*p as *p ^ 1 folding on the tree level isn't strictly necessary
so this is a missed opt on RTL or expand.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-07-18 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-07-19  8:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-07-19  8:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-19  8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot       |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   |gnu.org                     |

--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-19 08:07:15 UTC ---
I have a patch for this already.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
       [not found] <bug-18908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-07-18 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-07-19  8:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-18 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org,
                   |                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-18 23:23:21 UTC ---
Only f3 is not optimized correctly on the trunk on the tree level.  bool ^ 1
should be converted into ~bool .


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
  2004-12-09 17:39 [Bug middle-end/18908] New: " falk at debian dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-05-04  1:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-04 18:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-04 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-04 18:15 -------
f2 is now fixed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  GCC build triplet|alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu |
   GCC host triplet|alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
  2004-12-09 17:39 [Bug middle-end/18908] New: " falk at debian dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2005-05-01 18:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-05-04  1:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-04 18:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-04  1:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 18908 depends on bug 15618, which changed state.

Bug 15618 Summary: Missed bool optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15618

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
  2004-12-09 17:39 [Bug middle-end/18908] New: " falk at debian dot org
  2004-12-09 17:45 ` [Bug middle-end/18908] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-25 20:42 ` sabre at nondot dot org
@ 2005-05-01 18:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-04  1:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-05-04 18:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-05-01 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-01 18:25 -------
With the patch for PR 15618 applied, f2 is fixed.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
  2004-12-09 17:39 [Bug middle-end/18908] New: " falk at debian dot org
  2004-12-09 17:45 ` [Bug middle-end/18908] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-04-25 20:42 ` sabre at nondot dot org
  2005-05-01 18:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: sabre at nondot dot org @ 2005-04-25 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From sabre at nondot dot org  2005-04-25 20:42 -------
note that the correct simplification for f4 is "*p = 1".

-Chris

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools
  2004-12-09 17:39 [Bug middle-end/18908] New: " falk at debian dot org
@ 2004-12-09 17:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2005-04-25 20:42 ` sabre at nondot dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-12-09 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-09 17:45 -------
Confirmed here is what we get on ppc:
_f1:
        lwz r3,0(r3)
        rlwinm r3,r3,0,31,31  <-- not useful
        blr
        .align 2
        .globl _f2
_f2:
        lwz r0,0(r3)
        addic r2,r0,-1
        subfe r3,r2,r0  <-- previous two instructions not useful  (comes from _Bool !=0 is not converted 
to _Bool, I think there is another bug about this)
        blr
        .align 2
        .globl _f3
_f3:
        lwz r0,0(r3)
        xori r0,r0,1
        addic r9,r0,-1
        subfe r2,r9,r0
        stw r2,0(r3)
        blr
        .align 2
        .globl _f4
_f4:
        lwz r0,0(r3)
        nor r0,r0,r0
        addic r9,r0,-1
        subfe r2,r9,r0
        stw r2,0(r3)
        blr


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-12-09 17:45:04
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-20 13:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-18908-2744@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-11-22 20:57 ` [Bug middle-end/18908] Missed folding opportunities with bools pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-22 21:00 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-22 22:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-11-25  5:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-18 17:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-02 14:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-30 19:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-30 20:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
     [not found] <bug-18908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-07-18 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-19  8:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-19  8:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-19 13:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-19 13:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-20 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-20 13:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2004-12-09 17:39 [Bug middle-end/18908] New: " falk at debian dot org
2004-12-09 17:45 ` [Bug middle-end/18908] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-04-25 20:42 ` sabre at nondot dot org
2005-05-01 18:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-04  1:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-05-04 18:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).