From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3362 invoked by alias); 12 May 2008 22:06:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 3133 invoked by uid 48); 12 May 2008 22:05:24 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 22:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080512220524.3132.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug ada/33889] Inefficient code expansion for extended return statement In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg00971.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #1 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-12 22:05 ------- This is not accessibility level which is computed here, but dynamic task master level, in case your interface is a synchronized interface. You can already use pragma Restrictions (No_Task_Hierarchy) if you do not want this code expansion. Arno -- charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33889