From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23042 invoked by alias); 19 May 2008 10:28:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 22949 invoked by uid 48); 19 May 2008 10:27:58 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 10:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080519102758.22948.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/25502] I64d format Werror problem in build In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg01362.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #18 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-19 10:27 ------- The problem here is not that the ms-formatter patch can't treat I/I32/I64. The problem is, that the ms-extensions are treated as gnu-extensions, which is in my option wrong. The scalar width specifiers should be treated as C89, and C90. So those meaningless warnings are avoided. The initial patch made this. I tried to discuss this while implementation with Danny, but he insisted that it should be implemented as gnu extensions, so it is. Cheers, Kai -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25502