From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6056 invoked by alias); 19 May 2008 17:55:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 5852 invoked by uid 48); 19 May 2008 17:54:20 -0000 Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 17:55:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080519175420.5851.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/26854] Inordinate compile times on large routines In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "lucier at math dot purdue dot edu" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg01378.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #69 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2008-05-19 17:54 ------- That really smashed the problem. I find the following timings without IRA: local alloc : 8.53 ( 4%) usr 0.01 ( 0%) sys 8.59 ( 3%) wall 7073 kB ( 1%) ggc global alloc : 30.44 (14%) usr 0.33 ( 2%) sys 30.83 (12%) wall 4961 kB ( 1%) ggc TOTAL : 211.48 17.00 261.74 766052 kB and with IRA: integrated RA : 10.58 ( 5%) usr 0.37 ( 2%) sys 11.05 ( 5%) wall 7138 kB ( 1%) ggc reload : 11.89 ( 6%) usr 0.01 ( 0%) sys 11.96 ( 5%) wall 4925 kB ( 1%) ggc TOTAL : 200.18 16.10 221.53 763565 kB Thanks! Brad -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26854