From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2601 invoked by alias); 20 May 2008 20:50:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 2417 invoked by uid 48); 20 May 2008 20:50:09 -0000 Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 20:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080520205009.2416.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/35658] [4.3/4.4 regression] Bad interaction on ia64 between -funroll-loops -fno-automatic -O2 and common block variable In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "sje at cup dot hp dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg01590.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2008-05-20 20:50 ------- I cannot reproduce this error. I have compiled the test case with various options and always get output that includes Test# 1 ( C201 ): *** failed *** and Test# 1 ( GENT ): *** failed *** I get this when I use -fno-automatic -O2 -funroll-loops and when I use no optimization at all. This is with GCC 4.3 released bits and ToT bits on a Debian 3.1 IA64 system. -- sje at cup dot hp dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sje at cup dot hp dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35658