From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27863 invoked by alias); 23 May 2008 00:50:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 27729 invoked by uid 48); 23 May 2008 00:49:36 -0000 Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 00:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080523004936.27728.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/36213] Wrong search path generation In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "martin dot drab at fjfi dot cvut dot cz" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg01746.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from martin dot drab at fjfi dot cvut dot cz 2008-05-23 00:49 ------- One more thing I've forgotten to mention is that (no matter if the --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs is there or not) files limits.h and syslimits.h are not generated into the internal "include" directory of the gcc, but into the "include-fixed" directory, where, however, gcc can't find them. So I had to create a symlink there, otherwise lots of stuff can't be compiled. Though, I don't know if it is due to the badly generated paths. Maybe if they were correct, gcc would have found the files even in that directory. So, that may actually be OK. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36213