From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5908 invoked by alias); 25 May 2008 14:46:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 5832 invoked by uid 48); 25 May 2008 14:45:43 -0000 Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 14:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080525144543.5831.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/36325] specific or generic INTERFACE implies the EXTERNAL attribute In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jaydub66 at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg01858.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from jaydub66 at gmail dot com 2008-05-25 14:45 ------- Ok, this produces an impressive list of regressions. Many of those (e.g. actual_procedure_1.f90) seem to be related to conf (external, dimension); /* See Fortran 95's R504. */ I'm not sure if the constraint from R504 is implemented correctly here, or if it constrains too much. Others testcases (like argument_checking_3.f90) fail because they define lots of specific interfaces, but no external implementation for those. So I guess they are actually invalid? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36325