From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11642 invoked by alias); 25 May 2008 19:09:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 11393 invoked by uid 48); 25 May 2008 19:08:36 -0000 Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 19:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080525190836.11392.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/36325] specific or generic INTERFACE implies the EXTERNAL attribute In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "janus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg01881.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-25 19:08 ------- Created an attachment (id=15684) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15684&action=view) patch Ok, I extended the patch, and got the regression count down from a few million to exactly two: FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_decl_9.f90 FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/reduction3.f90 What I did was e.g. following Tobi's suggestion about the dimension problem: > conf2(external,dimension) > is in any case wrong. It should be: > conflict(external with implicit interface, dimension) Also I made sure not to interfere with dummy procedures, turned on argument checking for (explicit-interfaced) external procedures and fixed an error message for a test case. I haven't looked at the two remaining regressions in detail, but both seem to be related to intrinsics. And I'm sure I can convince those two little fuckers to disappear soon. Patch is attached. -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36325