From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27896 invoked by alias); 28 May 2008 08:19:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 27713 invoked by uid 48); 28 May 2008 08:18:51 -0000 Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 08:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080528081851.27712.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/36296] wrong warning about potential uninitialized variable In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "vincent at vinc17 dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg02047.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #7 from vincent at vinc17 dot org 2008-05-28 08:18 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > BTW, the i = i trick > > it only works in the initializer and not as a statement after the fact. But in such a case, as i is not initialized yet, this may be undefined behavior with some C implementations. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36296