From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-253202-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29528 invoked by alias); 28 May 2008 08:22:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 29381 invoked by uid 48); 28 May 2008 08:21:54 -0000
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 08:22:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20080528082154.29380.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-36352-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/36352] missed "inlining" of static untouched variable in linked once function
In-Reply-To: <bug-36352-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg02048.txt.bz2



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-05-28 08:21 -------
I think this is more of an issue of changing the variable to be readonly than
an "inlining" the variable issue as the following source works as expected:
template <int a> int f(int i)
{
  static const int t = a;
  static const int t1 = a;
  return i?t:t1;
}

int g(void)
{
  return f<1>(1);
}


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|missed "inlining" of static |missed "inlining" of static
                   |untouched variable in linked|untouched variable in linked
                   |once function               |once function


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36352