From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12104 invoked by alias); 31 May 2008 09:17:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 11998 invoked by uid 48); 31 May 2008 09:17:07 -0000 Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 09:17:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080531091707.11997.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/35830] ICE with PROCEDURE() containing array formal arguments In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "janus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-05/txt/msg02298.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-31 09:17 ------- Ok, apparently rev. 136130 *did* in fact also fix the test case in comment #1 (although I somehow assumed otherwise), and therefore this whole PR is fixed. Should I add another test case with an assumed shape array (or simply change proc_decl_12.f90 to have an assumed shape instead of an explicit shape array)? Or is proc_decl_12.f90 enough as it is? -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2008-04-06 12:44:34 |2008-05-31 09:17:07 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35830