public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/35830] ICE with PROCEDURE(<interface>) containing array formal arguments
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:45:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080602084438.10460.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-35830-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-06-02 08:44 -------
> Should I add another test case with an assumed shape array (or simply change
> proc_decl_12.f90 to have an assumed shape instead of an explicit shape array)?
> Or is proc_decl_12.f90 enough as it is?

In principle, no test case should be removed - only new ones added. (I try to
find time this evening to look at the PRs and at your patch,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-06/msg00001.html )


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35830


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-02  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-05  8:14 [Bug fortran/35830] New: ICE with PROCEDURE(<interface>) burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-05 14:57 ` [Bug fortran/35830] ICE with PROCEDURE(<interface>) containing array formal arguments burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-05 18:03 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com
2008-04-06 12:45 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-07 22:02 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com
2008-04-08  8:37 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-04-09 18:49 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com
2008-05-15 21:49 ` jaydub66 at gmail dot com
2008-05-28 21:29 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-28 21:35 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-31  9:17 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-02  8:45 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2008-06-07 17:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-07 17:31 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-07 17:44 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-08  7:50 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-08  7:50 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080602084438.10460.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).