From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21980 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2008 04:28:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 21894 invoked by uid 48); 18 Jun 2008 04:27:15 -0000 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080618042715.21893.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/36553] [4.4 Regression] regression due to revision 136821 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg01067.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-18 04:27 ------- When I revert just the files in my patch, the test case passes with -m32 and segfaults on -m64 at run time. I don't think this is related to 136821 directly. Looking at the -fdump-tree-original between -m32 and -m64, there are a large number of variables that change from kind=4 with -m32 to kind=8 with -m64. Something is definitely out of whack. This is looking like a Hiesenbug. I am going to need help to find this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36553