public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-10-04 12:30 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-04 14:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (22 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-04 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #38 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-04 12:30 -------
As a 4.1 kludge, i can make the points-to analyzer do what it does for unions,
which is to glob everything to a single variable for those classes where it has
found two fields it thinks overlap.
This will lose alias precision, but it won't be worse than what 4.0 was.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-04 12:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-04 14:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-04 15:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-04 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #39 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-04 14:06 -------
*** Bug 24190 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Thomas dot Svedberg at
| |chalmers dot se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-04 12:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-04 14:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-04 15:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-04 15:28 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
` (20 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-04 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #40 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-04 15:12 -------
(In reply to comment #38)
> As a 4.1 kludge, i can make the points-to analyzer do what it does for unions,
> which is to glob everything to a single variable for those classes where it has
> found two fields it thinks overlap.
>
> This will lose alias precision, but it won't be worse than what 4.0 was.
Yes please. This bug really annoys me ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-04 15:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-04 15:28 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2005-10-04 21:05 ` jason at redhat dot com
` (19 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: mark at codesourcery dot com @ 2005-10-04 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #41 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-04 15:28 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack
calculates offset incorrectly
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #40 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-04 15:12 -------
> (In reply to comment #38)
>
>>As a 4.1 kludge, i can make the points-to analyzer do what it does for unions,
>>which is to glob everything to a single variable for those classes where it has
>>found two fields it thinks overlap.
>>
>>This will lose alias precision, but it won't be worse than what 4.0 was.
>
>
> Yes please. This bug really annoys me ;)
I agree that this is a reasonable solution. In fact, if you see
conflicting field types for some chunk of memory, I don't think it would
necessarily be unreasonable to just say that the whole object has some
unknown-type alias information. C++ should provide an accurate
representation of multiple inheritance to the middle-end; if it doesn't,
it gets what it deserves, but it would be nice if programs still worked.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-04 15:28 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
@ 2005-10-04 21:05 ` jason at redhat dot com
2005-10-04 21:14 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
` (18 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jason at redhat dot com @ 2005-10-04 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #42 from jason at redhat dot com 2005-10-04 21:05 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack
calculates offset incorrectly
mark at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> So, I guess maybe we agree on the right plan. In particular:
>
> 1. When we see "T*" or "T&", use the as-base version of T for the type.
> Therefore, for expressions like "*p" where "p" has type "T*", we would
> give the expression the as-base version of T. However, for expressions
> like "t" (where "t" is of type "T"), use the complete version of "t".
Yep.
> 2. Undo your change at the end of layout_class_type, so that base fields
> have the as-base type.
Agreed.
> We could implement (1) either by (a) doing that directly during parsing,
> etc., or (b) by handling it during genericization/gimplification. I
> vote for the latter. It should be relatively simple; do a pre-order
> walk of the expression tree, and adjust the types of things from the
> bottom up.
>
> I'm not sure what else we would need to do. We need to tell the
> optimizers that the as-base type can alias the complete type; I guess we
> just give them the same alias set.
I was suggesting that instead of making the complete type and base type
essentially copies of one another, that we make the complete type a
wrapper around the base type. Proper alias semantics would fall out of
that.
> We also need the optimizers to
> understand that "*p = *q" is going to copy TYPE_SIZE (complete type)
> bytes...
We don't do bitwise assignment if a class has a vptr, so whenever we
generate something like that the complete type and base type should be
the same.
Jason
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-04 21:05 ` jason at redhat dot com
@ 2005-10-04 21:14 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2005-10-06 19:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: mark at codesourcery dot com @ 2005-10-04 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #43 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-10-04 21:14 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack
calculates offset incorrectly
jason at redhat dot com wrote:
> I was suggesting that instead of making the complete type and base type
> essentially copies of one another, that we make the complete type a
> wrapper around the base type. Proper alias semantics would fall out of
> that.
That's a nice idea. It would make life a little more complicated for
the front end; when seeing "a.b", you have to generate a double
COMPONENT_REF, because the internal representation is a.as_base.b. But,
that's a relatively localized change. We could actually do that at
gimplification/genericization-time too, I guess, which would be a nice
start towards proper lowering.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-04 21:14 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
@ 2005-10-06 19:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-08 17:26 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-06 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #44 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-06 19:38 -------
Subject: Bug 22488
CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc
Module name: gcc
Changes by: dberlin@gcc.gnu.org 2005-10-06 19:38:00
Modified files:
gcc : ChangeLog tree-ssa-structalias.c
Added files:
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa: pr22488.C
Log message:
2005-10-06 Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
Fix PR tree-optimization/22488
* tree-ssa-structalias.c (check_for_overlaps): New function.
(create_variable_info_for): Use it.
Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.10106&r2=2.10107
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-structalias.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.30&r2=2.31
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr22488.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-06 19:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-08 17:26 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-09 15:45 ` [Bug c++/22488] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-08 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #45 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-08 17:26 -------
Pushing the real fix off to 4.2 and unassigning, since it is worked around for
4.1
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Target Milestone|4.1.0 |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-08 17:26 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-09 15:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-09 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #46 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-09 15:45 -------
The real fix is a front-end fix.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|tree-optimization |c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-09 15:45 ` [Bug c++/22488] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 14:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-30 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P2 |P5
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-10-31 14:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-22 21:54 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2 " jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-10-31 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.1.0 |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2005-10-31 14:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-22 21:54 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-14 21:39 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-22 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #47 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 21:54 -------
Accepting so I remember to implement my proposal sometime soon.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2006-01-30 12:40:45 |2006-08-22 21:54:36
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2006-08-22 21:54 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2 " jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-05-14 21:39 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-20 3:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-05-14 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #48 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-14 22:27 -------
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.2.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2007-05-14 21:39 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-07-20 3:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 19:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-20 3:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.1 |4.2.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2007-07-20 3:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-09 19:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-01 16:54 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-09 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #49 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-09 19:22 -------
Change target milestone to 4.2.3, as 4.2.2 has been released.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.2 |4.2.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-09 19:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-01 16:54 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 20:25 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-01 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #50 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-01 16:52 -------
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.3 |4.2.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2008-02-01 16:54 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-05-19 20:25 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 20:47 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-19 20:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #51 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-19 20:22 -------
4.2.4 is being released, changing milestones to 4.2.5.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.4 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-19 20:25 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-05-19 20:47 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 22:46 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-19 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #52 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-19 20:39 -------
retargeting for 4.4.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-19 20:47 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-04 22:46 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-21 16:02 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #53 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 22:45 -------
Closing 4.1 branch.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]|[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression]
|push_fields_onto_fieldstack |push_fields_onto_fieldstack
|calculates offset |calculates offset
|incorrectly |incorrectly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2008-07-04 22:46 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-04-21 16:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-22 10:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-21 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.4.0 |4.4.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2009-04-21 16:02 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-07-22 10:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-15 12:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-07-22 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.4.1 |4.4.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2009-07-22 10:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-10-15 12:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-21 13:19 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-30 8:58 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-10-15 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.4.2 |4.4.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2009-10-15 12:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-21 13:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-30 8:58 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-21 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.4.3 |4.4.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/22488] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2010-01-21 13:19 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-30 8:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
23 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-30 8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.4.4 |4.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22488
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-30 8:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-22488-7559@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-04 12:30 ` [Bug tree-optimization/22488] [4.1 Regression] push_fields_onto_fieldstack calculates offset incorrectly dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-04 14:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-04 15:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-04 15:28 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2005-10-04 21:05 ` jason at redhat dot com
2005-10-04 21:14 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2005-10-06 19:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-08 17:26 ` dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-09 15:45 ` [Bug c++/22488] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-30 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-31 14:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-22 21:54 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2 " jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-14 21:39 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2/4.3 " mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-20 3:50 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 19:29 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-01 16:54 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 20:25 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 20:47 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 22:46 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.2/4.3/4.4 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-04-21 16:02 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.2/4.3/4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-22 10:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-15 12:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-21 13:19 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.3/4.4/4.5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-30 8:58 ` [Bug c++/22488] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).