From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28001 invoked by alias); 5 Jul 2008 05:29:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 27790 invoked by uid 48); 5 Jul 2008 05:28:16 -0000 Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 05:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080705052816.27789.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug inline-asm/23200] [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] rejects "i"(&var + 1) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "stsp at users dot sourceforge dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00698.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #37 from stsp at users dot sourceforge dot net 2008-07-05 05:28 ------- But I only tried to open the new bugs about the _other_ -O0 vs -O2 differences that popped up in this thread. The original bug is still here I believe. At least it seems people think it should work with -O0 too, which right now it does not. -- stsp at users dot sourceforge dot net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23200