From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31686 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2008 12:37:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 31484 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jul 2008 12:37:01 -0000 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 12:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080720123701.31483.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug debug/36668] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/other/PR23205.C scan-assembler .stabs.*foobar:c=i In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg01610.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 12:37 ------- For cris-elf (and crisv32-elf), it was introduced between r136899(*) and r136903, in which the only suspect patch is Honza's enable unit-at-a-time/-fno-toplevel-reorder patch. In PR23205.s for cris-elf and crisv32-elf, the only stabs line matching "foobar" is: .stabs "foobar:S(0,25)=k(0,7)",38,0,5,__ZL6foobar *) with a subsequently committed patch applied; that revision didn't actually build. Honza, are you working on this or should it be xfailed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36668