From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27056 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2008 21:14:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 26880 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2008 21:13:37 -0000 Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080720211337.26879.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg01641.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #18 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-20 21:13 ------- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault All the blocks we have marked in the bitmap to eh cleanup exist when we pass them to tree_purge_dead_eh_edges. tree_purge_dead_eh_edges seems to decide to delete some of them earlier than it expects, and then crashes when they don't later exist. On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 4:39 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > -- > > rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot > | |org > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36766