From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18780 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2008 05:57:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 18684 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2008 05:56:19 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:57:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20080722055619.18683.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/36708] syntatic warning In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "robert dot lore at opensyscon dot com dot au" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg01697.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #3 from robert dot lore at opensyscon dot com dot au 2008-07-22 05:56 ------- Subject: RE: syntatic warning I did not have the flags you nominated set. Thanks for you assistance Robert -----Original Message----- From: manu at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org] Sent: Tuesday, 22 July 2008 2:17 AM To: robert.lore@opensyscon.com.au Subject: [Bug c/36708] syntatic warning ------- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-21 16:16 ------- We need a complete testcase. I tried to reproduce this but GCC 4.4 with -Wall -Wextra -Wunused always says: src/pr36708.c:5: warning: left-hand operand of comma expression has no effect src/pr36708.c:5: warning: statement with no effect So this may be already fixed or your testcase is special. What flags are you using? -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36708 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36708